Canada Housing disaster 2025: The Great Canadian Shell Game
If you’ve been waiting for a miracle in the Canadian housing market, I hope you like waiting. Despite the “bold” headlines coming out of Ottawa and the provinces, the average Canadian is still getting squeezed until the pips squeak.
I thought it was time to do an annual review on how our governments performed in 2025 regarding the housing shortage crisis. The quick assessment? It is a failure of math, policy, and will.
We’ve had a new budget, a new “housing czar” approach from the Federal Government, and a lot of expensive-looking agencies. But let’s look at the numbers—because the numbers don’t lie, even if the politicians do.
The 1995 vs. 2025 Reality Check
To understand why the current government strategies are failing, we first need to look at how fundamentally the market has broken compared to 30 years ago.
In 1995, people complained about high interest rates (nearly 9%). Today, the government pats itself on the back for rates around 4.5%. But this ignores the “Interest Rate Paradox”: A lower rate on a massive debt is far more dangerous than a high rate on a small debt.
The following tables break down exactly how the goalposts have moved.
1. Financials: The “Affordability” Illusion
The shift from a cash-flow problem to a debt-load problem.
| Metric | 1995 (Average) | Today (Average) | Change |
| Average Home Price | ~$160,000 | ~$720,000 | +350% |
| Household Income | ~$55,000 | ~$96,000 | +75% |
| Mortgage Rate (5-Yr) | ~9.00% | ~4.50% | -50% |
| Monthly Payment | ~$1,190 | ~$3,770 | +216% |
| Payment-to-Income | ~26% | ~47% | Crisis Level |
Sources: CREA National Price Map | Bank of Canada Historical Rates
2. The Rental Trap
The government claims their policies help renters eventually buy. The data proves the opposite. High rents are stripping away the ability to save.
| Metric | 1995 (Average) | Today (Average) | Change |
| Avg. Rent (2-Bed) | ~$590 | ~$2,060 | +249% |
| Rent % of Income | ~13% | ~26% | Doubled |
| Vacancy Rate | ~4.2% | ~1.5% | Critically Low |
Source: Rentals.ca National Rent Report (Jan 2026)
The 2025 Federal Budget: Smoke, Mirrors, and Bill C-15
The 2025 Federal Budget, titled “Canada Strong,” was tabled on November 4, 2025. It promised to fix these disparities. It didn’t take long for the industry to realize the “500,000 homes a year” promise was more of a hallucination than a plan.
What did they actually “give” you?
- The GST Rebate: A full rebate on new homes up to $1 million. Sounds great, until you try finding a new detached home for under a million in the GTA or GVA. It’s a carrot on a stick that most people can’t reach.
- Build Canada Homes (BCH): A new $13 billion “super-agency” designed to act as a federal developer. Translation: more bureaucracy, more studies, and more government employees in Ottawa while you’re still living in your parents’ basement.
- The “Double the Pace” Myth: The Prime Minister promised to double construction to 500,000 units a year. Let’s check the scoreboard.
The “Supply” Lie: We Are Building More, But Falling Further Behind
There is a popular talking point that “housing starts are up.” Technically, this is true. According to the latest CMHC Housing Starts Report, we saw a year-over-year increase of roughly 5.6% in housing starts, reaching a total of 259,028.
In a normal market, that would be good news. In our market, it is a drop in the ocean.
3. Supply & Demand: The Per-Capita Collapse
We are building more homes than in 1995, but our population has exploded.
| Metric | 1995 (Average) | Today (Average) | Change |
| Population | 29.3 Million | 41.6 Million | +42% |
| Homes Built (Starts) | ~111,000 | 259,028 | +133% |
| Target Needed | N/A | 500,000 | Missed by 48% |
The government pushes the “Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate” (SAAR) to make the numbers look bigger. But we need to look at actual shovels in the ground. To hit the government’s own target of 500,000 homes, we need to start 41,667 homes every single month.
Here is the real 2025 scoreboard, updated with the final December actuals:
| Month (2025) | Actual Units Started | Progress Toward Monthly Goal (42k) |
| January | 14,850 | 35% |
| February | 15,120 | 36% |
| March | 16,400 | 39% |
| April | 20,440 | 49% |
| May | 23,870 | 57% |
| June | 23,282 | 56% |
| July | 23,464 | 56% |
| August | 18,408 | 44% |
| September | 22,375 | 53% |
| October | 19,174 | 46% |
| November | 21,870 | 52% |
| December | 20,716 | 49% |
| Rural/Other Est. | ~19,000 | (Annual adj. for rural areas) |
| TOTAL 2025 | 259,028 | Total Failure |
The Verdict: Despite a modest bump over last year, we didn’t even hit half of the target. We are building for a 1995 population with a 2026 demand.
The Development Fee Shakedown: The Hidden Tax
Why aren’t builders building more? The answer lies in the “hidden” tax municipalities levy on every new door: Development Charges (DCs).
The Federal and Provincial governments are largely to blame for this. Over the last 30 years, upper levels of government have “downloaded” the costs of infrastructure (roads, sewers, transit) to municipalities without giving them the tax tools to pay for it.
Cities are legally required to balance their budgets. With no help from the Feds or Provinces, they have turned to the only piggy bank they have left: New Home Buyers.
4. The Cost of Government (Development Fees)
The price you pay before a single brick is laid.
| City | 2025 Dev. Fees (Approx.) | 2015 Dev. Fees (Approx.) | % Increase |
| Toronto | $180,600 | $65,000 | 178% |
| Vancouver | $125,500 | $48,000 | 161% |
| Markham | $180,300 | $58,000 | 210% |
| Burlington | $111,600 | $38,000 | 194% |
| Calgary | $52,000 | $24,000 | 116% |
Source: CMHC: We Built This City on Development Charges (2025 Report)
Your government is treating new homebuyers like an ATM. You’re paying nearly $200k in fees in the GTA. That isn’t “growth paying for growth”; that is the government taxing the next generation into poverty to balance books they refused to manage responsibly.
The Ultimate Barrier: The Down Payment
The most crushing metric of all is not the monthly payment, but the time required to enter the market. In 1995, the barrier was interest; today, it is capital.
5. Barrier to Entry
The “Time-to-Save” Crisis.
| Metric | 1995 (Average) | Today (Average) | Change |
| Down Payment (10%) | $16,000 | $72,000 | +350% |
| Years to Save (National) | ~2.9 Years | ~7.5 Years | +158% |
| Years to Save (Major City) | ~4 Years | ~25+ Years | Broken |
Source: National Bank of Canada Housing Affordability Monitor
Where Are We Heading? (The Cold, Hard Forecast)
Don’t expect a crash. Expect a “grind.” As interest rates settle, the pent-up demand will hit the market again. Because we failed to build the 500,000 homes promised, prices will start their climb once more. It won’t happen anytime soon, but the basic economics of supply and demand rules will apply here.
| Metric | 2025 (Current) | 2026 (Projected) | 2028 (Outlook) |
| Avg. Home Price | $676,705 (-1.4%) | $698,622 (+3.2%) | $765,000+ |
| Rental Rates | Slight Cooling (-2%) | Rising (+3-5%) | New Record Highs |
| Vacancy Rate | 1.8% | 1.6% | < 1.5% |
The bottom line: The government is playing a shell game. They move the money around, change the names of the programs, and tell you they’re “building for you.” But until those development fees drop and the shovels actually hit the dirt at a rate of 40k+ a month, you’re just paying for their expensive mistakes.
Stay skeptical, Canada.
Your best interest is my only interest. I reply to all questions and I welcome your comments. Like this article? Share with a friend.
Steve Garganis: 416-224-0114; steve@canadamortgagenews.
Categories
Bank News, Consumer Debt, Debt, Finance, Money saving tips, Mortgage News, Mortgage Tips, Rate forecast, Real Estate news
Steve Garganis View All
As an industry insider, Steve will share info that the BANKS don't want you to know. Steve has appeared on TV's Global Morning News, CBC's "Our Toronto" and The Real Life TV show. He's also been quoted in several newspapers such as the Globe and Mail, The Toronto Star, The Vancouver Sun, The Star Phoenix, etc.